Independent and platform-agnostic
Cyber-security inspired tech captures every AI decision regardless of model, vendor, device, or deployment.
Independent evidence infrastructure for AI decisions
The black box recorder for enterprise AI
Existing risk-management systems are insufficient for the AI world. Now there's Loxodrome.
The problem
Your organisation is using and launching AI. Now what?
Pre-deployment processes have gotten you this far, but generative AI is just that: generative. Monitoring live AI is another challenge entirely.
How will you ensure that your company's AI usage is continuously doing what it's meant to, fix it immediately if it's not, and prove it to regulators when they ask?
Our solution
Loxodrome is the independent witness and notary of all your AI.
Complete visibility → real-time risk management → audit-grade proof.
In EU AI Act terms, we are a post-market monitoring system for AI.
Click any tier to expand
Level 03Evidence⌄
Independent, tamper-proof, audit-grade evidence
- —Board and executive reporting
- —Compliance for regulatory and contractual requirements
- —Customer complaint triage
- —Cryptographic proof of every decision chain
Level 02Risk Management⌄
Real-time, continuous assurance of your risk frameworks
- —DLP enforcement: block, allow, warn, notify
- —Live alerts for critical AI risk events, including agentic AI
- —Monitoring of human-in-the-loop interventions
- —Policy drift detection across deployed models
Level 01Visibility⌄
Complete and accurate visibility of every AI interaction
- —Human-initiated AI: sanctioned, unsanctioned (shadow AI), all device types
- —Vendor AI and CPS 230 material service provider governance
- —Agentic AI: decision provenance with full, contextual event chains
- —Cross-platform capture, independent of model or vendor
Our customers
Built for risk teams in regulated industries.
Designed for the structural and regulatory demands of high-risk institutions, by directors and operators who have lived it.
The gold standard
Loxodrome's advantage.
We are expert technologists in AI regulation.
We see around corners, so that you don't have to.
Lightweight and easy to install
Built to be fast, intuitive, and easy. If it takes more than a month to implement, we haven't done our jobs.
Scales with your AI usage
From a single sanctioned tool to thousands of agentic decisions, the ledger grows with you.
Multi-jurisdictional compliance
One implementation covers all of your domestic and international exposure, today and in the future.
Real insight and business context
Single, isolated event data isn't helpful. We give you the full lifecycle of an AI decision so you know what happened, why, and what to do about it.
Deep subject matter expertise
We are obsessed with AI regulation. We watch and talk to AI regulators to ensure our product evolves to support the latest AI regulation.
The regulator's view
“ASIC is continuing to monitor how entities are using AI, and we will take enforcement action where appropriate, where we see misconduct occurring. So yes — you will get in trouble when technology is not used responsibly.”
— Joe Longo, ASIC Chair · ABA Banking Conference, July 2025
The regulatory wave
A regulatory wave is approaching.
“AI regulations are expected to cover the majority of global economies by the end of the decade.”
— Gartner
European Union
EU AI Act enforcement.
Phased enforcement through 2026-2027. Fines up to 7% of global turnover for prohibited and high-risk violations.
Australia
CPS 230 in effect.
APRA's operational-risk standard already binds banks, insurers, and superannuation funds — including AI used by material service providers.
International
ISO 42001 adoption.
The first AI management-system standard. Certification is rapidly becoming an enterprise procurement requirement.
United States
State-by-state laws.
Colorado, California, Utah, and Tennessee have introduced AI-specific statutes. Federal harmonisation is unresolved.
Independent governance is critical
AI providers can't credibly govern their own AI.
Trusting a provider (Microsoft, Claude, Google) to audit its own model is a fundamental conflict of interest. Traditional compliance software relies on self-attestation, reinforcing this problem. Loxodrome provides independent third-party proof.
“You can't notarise your own documents. So why would you trust your AI provider to govern its own AI?”
Provider self-attestation
audit-log.json · signed by vendor
Compliance-software self-report
internal-control.csv · stored in-platform
— Independent witness —
Loxodrome ledger entry
0x9f4a · sha-256 · sealed 04:21:08 UTC
Decision provenance chain
17 events · agentic · prompt → action
Contact us
Want to learn more? Drop us a line.
Now is the best time to put proactive, scalable AI governance infrastructure in place. Your AI estate is quickly becoming more complex, and AI regulation is growing stricter.